Okay. I'm gonna pull an English class trope. "I like this narrator even better than the last one!" says student, not yet triple-digit pages into the book. "They're just different!". But I'm serious this time! Here's why:
There are a few things that make Esther more immediately relatable than the occasionally frustrating and inexplicable Holden. Like many Uni students elementary and middle school experiences, including my own, she is able to "game" education, but for her she still gets straight A's in college. I mean the Class Dean "knew perfectly well [Esther] would get a straight A again in the chemistry course", so she uses this time to work on her English craft instead (Plath, 35-36). Some might say this is lame of her to do, but Esther is the only one in her class who can ace the material even though she HATES it, so it's sort of a deserved courtesy to excuse her from the academic duties. This gives her some credibility over Holden (to me at least) since she tries AND massively succeeds in a school setting, but still has gripes about parts of her education. I couldn't help but get kind of skeptical of Holden's world-weariness when he admits that he barely ever tries but is still totally disillusioned with education. Like could you exert yourself and then make your conclusions? Perhaps a bit unfair on my part, since Holden has some personal issues and all, but this is about my personal feelings towards Esther in relation to Holden, so put it in the pros column for Ms. Greenwood over here. Her ability backs up her criticisms.
Also, though this might be bogus of me, Esther's mental situation is simply easier to understand and deal with from a real-life standpoint than Holden's. Don't get me wrong, both are going through stages of serious depression, but the picture for Esther seems more lifelike and believable (tough self-questioning, extreme loneliness, "moving dully along in the middle of the surrounding hullabaloo") than Holden's does (Plath, 3). Though I really hate to bash Caufield for this, his own existential depression seems absolutely unsolvable. Like head-bashingly frustrating. To be completely transience-phobic is somewhat understandable from the grief of losing Allie and Jane, but it's sooooo hard to imagine anyone ever talking through it with him, or helping him in any substantial way. Even Phoebe calls him out super hard, telling him that "[y]ou don't like anything that's happening" (Salinger, 187). Not to say Holden's emotions are any less "real" than Esther's or anything like that, but Esther's is easier to understand, and when one comes to grips with either of their mental makeups, her's generates more sympathy for me at least. The fact that she knows and articulates that she's "supposed to be having the time of [her] life" contains a self-awareness that is critical in my own acquainting with Esther (Plath, 2). It's still quite early in the book, but the personal dislocation she's experiencing seems more dire than Holden's did at the same point (Doreen scene especially so, and right off the bat) and with the fact of her problems being simply more tangible, Esther's literary manifestation of depression garners more immediate emotional connection.
Unlike Holden for the bulk of his own novel, there's a few things Esther really does enjoy and wants to do with her life. Again, these qualities help to form a more believable protagonist that I can get behind. She's clearly a talented and fairly dedicated writer, considering her English major and winning of essay contests. She has a pretty good sense of humor, even if it's at the expense of others, and isn't quite as mean-spirited with her caricatures as Holden can be. Then there's the funny yet subtly important stuff, like how she REALLY likes hot baths, and is a serious New England foodie. Esther says she "love[s] food more than just about anything else" and that she can't think of many things "a hot bath can't cure", so these seem to be intimate personal details despite some conversational hyperbole (Plath, 24, 19). It's honestly startling and refreshing to have a protagonist who enjoys certain aspects of life so early in the book, and isn't always criticizing nearly everything and everyone. To clarify yet again, I don't necessarily believe Esther is a more entertaining or inherently better narrator character, but that she is simply more of a real person, and for coming-of-age novels, I think that's extremely valuable from a reader sympathy standpoint.
So yeah, Holden can come across as a lame-o with his stream of mean remarks, and his own mental state can seem more like a cosmic affliction rather than Esther's lifelike portrayal of depression. It's tough to articulate, since depression definitely can seem like an impossible circumstance, where even those in the best of situations can have it. But for the scope of each novel, The Bell Jar has done a better job in showing the finer nuances of its protagonist's mental state, and (in my opinion) builds likability with Esther more effectively.
I can't say that I agree with you about which narrator is better, I honestly have not made up my mind yet one way or the other. I do think that Esther's problems seem a lot more relatable than Holden's. I think that as Uni students many of us can appreciate Esther's position. She is obviously smart, and good at school, but she does not really know what she wants to do with her life. I also agree that Esther's conflict does seem to have a real solution, and that could be what makes her in some ways a better narrator; if she solves her problem then we as the readers can solve ours, while Holden's unsolvable problem does not provide the reader with closure.
ReplyDeleteI agree with you mostly that Esther is more likeable and understandable than Holden. Esther plays the game of school pretty well whereas Holden is determined to completely ignore it. I feel like most Uni students are more able to relate to Esther than Holden on a variety of levels, most of which you already stated. However I do think everyone has a little bit of Holden in them when it comes to the "game of school".
ReplyDeleteI would even go so far as to categorize Holden's mental state as something like a perpetual state of rage and frustration that bubbles up and simmers down whereas Esther is an individual who experiences sadness and fear and eventually shuts down over prolonged periods of disappointment or pressure. I believe that neither of them can ever truly get over their problems. Esther claims to be better, but the bell jar still hangs. Although she has had a personal success, there is still the potential for a relapse which would be a result of her mental condition as opposed to the chronic "problem with society" holden has. I think there is a difference between the two but I think they've both got a permanent demon.
ReplyDeleteI must take issue with one tiny detail in your post because it jumped out at me- I personally don't think that Esther necessarily "deserved" the exemption from her chemistry class. In my opinion just because she gets straight A's doesn't mean she's entitled to skip requirements. But I also must admire her connivery in getting out of the one class that she may not end up getting an A in. For the rest of your post though, I think I agree? I haven't quite decided which character I relate to more. Good post- made me think!
ReplyDelete