Friday, March 31, 2017

Marilynne Robinson and the Elements of Transience

Shout-out to Housekeeping. It was a good run, Ruthie and company. One of the most obvious assets it’s got going for it is the ridiculous literary attention-to-detail.  Like I said in my LAST blog post, every sentence is freakin’ loaded with intriguing descriptive language and, in my opinion, serious symbolic imagery (Ooh!). I’ll admit, I feel like a broken record on the symbolism thing. In my past three Mitchell classes, I’ve written like two or three short essays on “symbology”, if I may. That’s not a word but I didn’t wanna use symbolism twice. Specifically, I think Marilynne Robinson focuses on the elements of nature as symbols of transience. Crazy, right? Time to lay it out for ya!

As some of you can probably guess from my preface, water is a huge part of this elemental symbolism. Let’s think about water for a second. No matter what you toss into it, what you slap it with, or how much you perturb the surface, the ripples will eventually cease, and the body of water will return to stasis as if nothing ever happened. Robinson caught on to a perfect device to communicate transience! We have two of the most monumental events in Fingerbone history—Helen’s suicide and the train disappearance—both of which are shrouded in factual dispute and disguised by the transient nature of the lake. Since when investigations are underway, the ripples have disappeared, and “[b]y evening the lake there had sealed itself over.” (9). All those lives and stories gone with a weasel-ploop. There’s a ton more water stuff in this book, which is fair considering it’s probably the most apt elemental symbol of transience one could find. That’s not to say I don’t have more though!

Another very common elemental example of transience is the air and wind. News flash, wind moves stuff around and makes it go places, often in random directional fashion. Going “wherever the wind takes you” is a common phrase for living out a transient ideology of wandering. Therefore, Robinson throws it in there an inordinate amount to drive her point home. One awesome excerpt involves air conjuring up the leaves, and directly relates to Ruth’s perception of life.

“Every spirit passing through the world fingers the tangible and mars the mutable, (…) the spirit passes on, just as the wind in the orchard picks up the leaves from the ground as if there were no other pleasure in the world but brown leaves, as if it would deck, clothe, flesh itself in flourishes of dusty brown apple leaves, and then drops them all in a heap at the side of the house and goes on.” (108)

It's a beautiful image; leaves being picked up by the wind, floundering as if to shape a figure or eventful dance, then just dropping to the side of a structure as the wind blows away. In a transient view, human life equates to leaves catching a drift and riding it out aimlessly for just a moment before ceasing. Pretty bleak I guess, definitely doesn’t make you feel too special. Hey! All you dead leaves! You’re just riding a drift for a few moments on the winds of time! There’s also mentions of Ruth and Sylvie’s clothes billowing out from the wind as if they’re about to be carried off, and Sylvie does open all the doors to expose their house to the elements, but especially air as a solvent. All are great uses of wind as a transience device.

The final of the major elements I noticed in Housekeeping would be fire. It has a brilliantly brief spotlight towards the end, and wraps up a transience-trilogy of interfering natural occurrences quite nicely. Fire burns stuff, and when stuff burns it goes away. Stuff often holds value and significance, things like memories are kept in stuff. So when it burns, especially in this non-digitalized world that the Housekeeping family lives in, all of its significance can go with it. As Ruth would probably say, such is life! Importance is forgotten in time! All things are insignificant! “The force behind the movement of time is a mourning that will not be comforted [!!!!]” (288). Sorry, there’s actually a period there. At least I bracketed the emphasis exclamations. EITHER WAY, what do Sylvie and Ruth do with fire? They burn lots of stuff inside their house, then eventually try to burn the whole dang thing down! Gosh darn transients, always stamping on all the fleeting permanence we have in life!! But wow, how blatantly symbolic can you get? The whole idea of Housekeeping going up in flames? All the cherished family memories that are sanctified in the maintenance of said house? All gone to the wind (and the flames) (and the water).

To close this off, here’s a little snippet that I think ties this all together. Here’s a brief passage Ruth uses to describe the ghostly state of affairs for Sylvie:

“She had haunted the orchard out of preference, but she could walk into the lake without ripple or displacement and sail up the air as invisibly as heat.” (307)

WOW, isn’t that everything I just talked about? Holy smokes! Sylvie, as the pure transient, doesn’t even RIPPLE the water when she walks into it, and can disappear at an instant like a smokeless trail of heat. How uneventful can you get? I think I’ll leave it at that. There’s the evidence you need to see that Robinson is employing these elemental minions to do her transience-preaching bidding. They do a darn good job after all. 

Friday, March 10, 2017

In Defense of Morbid Humor

Housekeeping, in the short glimpse we've gotten, has been a very nice surprise at the end of my strange school-week. Personal note here, but in the stupor of painkillers taken while trying to heal my spasmodic lower back, the wonderful prose and unique storytelling of Ruth have caught my eye. Even while barely conscious, I've been able to wring stuff out of Housekeeping's narrative, partially since the whole re-read-sentences-or-else-you-miss-a-bunch-of-stuff style is how I read books anyway. My eyes go a little too fast, so I'm right at home with Robinson's loaded passages.

The two anecdotes our class-time has dedicated itself to are the couple of "weirdly funny" scenes involving Edmund Foster, train-wrecked grandfather of Ruth, and Helen, who drives Bernice's Ford and herself off the side of a cliff to her doom. Like we've discussed, these two events in their plain and literal significance are no laughing matters. A massive train-wreck kills hundreds. A mother commits suicide. Totally horrible. But through the detailed yet emotionally detached accounts of these events by Ruth, they are riddled with an unusual and slightly uncomfortable humor. It mostly boils down to the vivid mental imagery Ruth conjures. After a few boys help her car out of the mud, the pleasant and polite Helen is then pictured "swerving and sliding across the meadow until she sailed off the edge of the cliff" (33). Though the actual context is quite sad, thinking of this mild-mannered woman spontaneously donut-ing to her death is darkly humorous. Then of course the train-wreck scene is rendered with a sense of weird, jarring passivity. What is a massive, crunching, spectacular loss of life is compared to a "weasel sliding off a rock" after "nos[ing] over toward the lake" (5). Gut reactions can be sort of like "Jeez! Isn't that your grandpa and dozens or hundreds of other people dying? And all you can think of is a weasel going *ploop* into the water?" I hear these pleas and agree something about Ruth's depictions is quite off-putting. But I'll argue for her as someone with a merely enhanced appreciation for the art of humor at inappropriate, often morbid occasions.

At least in the case of Edmund, Ruth has never encountered this man in her life. She isn't supposed to have many emotional ties to the guy. Much like me in the case of my great-great grandfather, Horatio Clayton Simmons. I swear, every detail I hear about this dude's life makes me laugh even harder. First of all, what kind of name is Horatio Clayton Simmons? That is legitimately hilarious. I couldn't think of a more obscure pasty name if I tried. Anyhow, this strange ancestor had 10 kids before dying at sea at age 50. You can call me twisted or whatever, but when I learned this detail, that Horatio Clayton Simmons, who made furnaces for a living, somehow got lost at sea and was never found again, I actually chuckled. How many random details can you fit into one life? However many it is, HC Simmons came pretty close to it. With all the insider knowledge Ruth has somehow attained, I wouldn't be too surprised if she could find an account of Horatio's last days. It was probably just as morbidly funny as her other stories are. Okay, maybe you had to be there. What is ACTUALLY really funny is my basketball coach's closing speech we had after our last game of the season. We got totally smoked, and so coach had to rally us up one last time and talk about how he's excited for the future of the team and all that. But when he goes into the details about how he and his buddies "worked in the cornfields for hours and then broke into the gym to go play basketball", me and two other players started quietly laughing. "What's funny?" he asked. Well what was funny was the mental image of these little southern Illinois boys being bored of corn or whatever and BREAKING INTO a basketball gym in the middle of nowhere, that's what! It was supposed to be inspirational, but the perfect cheesiness of it all just got to us. Sorry coach.

The point of all this is that humor often comes from the unexpected. There are actually theories that comedy comes from situations being different from what they're supposed to be. It might seem vague at first, but the idea of irony and incongruity driving humor makes a lot of sense to me at least. In the contexts mentioned, with a train plopping into the lake like a weasel, or a suicidal woman politely eating strawberries on the front of her car, or my direct ancestor being named Horatio Clayton Simmons and doing lots of strange things, when told correctly, they are all funny despite the morbid inhibitions. So in defense of Ruth, it's quite possible that this humor comes easier to her, and that she was never totally emotionally attached to the subject matter. Neither of her examples were in her control after all. From a child-care perspective, one might even be happy to see she's coped with the deaths of her ancestors with no visible psychological impact. Though I will give it to critics of this quality, it is still a little unsettling.